Apophenia
Apophenia: In psychology, the perception of connections and
meaningfulness in unrelated things. Apophenia can be a
normal phenomenon or an abnormal one, as in paranoid
schizophrenia when the patient sees ominous patterns where
there are none.
Defined it as "unmotivated seeing of connections a specific feeling of an abnormal meaningfulness". He described the early stages of delusion thought as self-referential, over interpretations of actual sensory perceptions, as opposed to Hallucinations.
Apophenia has come to imply a human propensity to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling.
Apophenia, the tendency to infer patterns or connections in unrelated input, can be considered a commonplace effect of brain function. Taken to an extreme, however, it can be a symptom of psychiatric dysfunction, for example, as a symptom in paranoid schizophrenia, where a patient sees hostile patterns in ordinary actions.
Pareidolia: Pareidolia is a type of apophenia involving the perception of images or sounds in random stimuli. A common example is the perception of a face within an inanimate object, the headlights and grill of an automobile may appear to be "grinning". People around the world see the "Man in the moon". People sometimes see the face of a religious figure in a piece of toast or in the grain of a piece of wood. There is strong evidence that the use of psychedelic drugs tends to induce or enhance pareidolia.
Pareidolia usually occurs as a result of the fusiform face area which is the part of the human brain responsible for seeing faces, mistakenly interpreting an object, shape, or configuration with some kind of perceived "face like" features as being a face.
Gambler's fallacy:
Apophenia is well-documented as a rationalization for gambling. Gamblers may imagine that they see patterns in the numbers that appear in lotteries, card games, or roulette wheels. One variation of this is known as the gambler's fallacy.
The problem of apophenia in finance has been addressed in academic articles, more specifically, within the world of finance itself, the examples most prone to apophenia are trading, structuring, sales, and compensation.
In contrast to an epiphany, an apophany does not provide insight into the nature of reality, nor its interconnectedness, but is a "process of repetitively and monotonously experiencing abnormal meanings in the entire surrounding experiential field. Such meanings are entirely self-referential, solipsistic, and paranoid, being observed, spoken about, the object of eavesdropping, followed by strangers.
Patternicity:
In 2008, Michael Shermer coined the word" patternicity", defining it as "the tendency to find meaningful patterns in meaningless noise".
Agenticity:
In the Believing brain, Shermer wrote that humans have the tendency to infuse patterns with meaning, intention, and agency, which he called agenticity.
Clustering illusion:
A clustering illusion is a type of cognitive bias in which a person sees a pattern as a random sequence of numbers or events. Many theories have been disproved as a result of this bias being highlighted.
Causes:
Apophenia is commonly referred to as an error in perception. Although there is no confirmed reason as to why it occurs, there are some respected theories.
Models of pattern recognition:
Is a cognitive process that involves retrieving information either from long-term, short- term or working memory and matching it with information from stimuli. However, there are three different ways it occurs there are some respected theories.
Template matching:
The stimulus is compared to templates or copies in the long-term memory. These templates are often stored as a result of past learning or educational experiences. For example, D,d, all are recognized as the same latter. This detection routine when applied to more complex data sets (such as for example, a painting or clusters of data) can result in the wrong template being matched. A false detection will result in apophenia.
Prototype matching:
This is similar to template matching, except for the fact that an exact match is not needed. An example of this would be to look at an animal such as a tiger and instead of recognizing that it was a tiger knowing that it was a cat (prototype matching) based on the known information about the characteristics of a cat.
This type of pattern recognition can result in apophenia based on the fact that since the brain is not looking for exact matches, it can pick up some characteristics of a match and assume it fits. This is more common with pareidolia than data collection.
Feature analysis:
The stimulus is broken down into its feature and allowed to process the information. This model of pattern recognition comes from the result of four stages, which are detection, pattern dissection, feature comparison in memory, and recognition.
Evolution:
One of the explanations put forth by evolutionary psychologists for apophenia is that it is not a flaw in the cognition of human brains but rather something that has come about through years of need. The study of this topic is referred to as error management theory. One of the most accredited studies in this field is Skinner's box and superstition.
This experiment involved taking a hungry pigeon, placing it in a box, and releasing a food pellet at a random time. The pigeon received a food pellet while performing some action, and so rather than attributing the arrival of the pellet to randomness, it repeated its action and continued to do so until another pellet fell. As the pigeon increased the number of times it performed the action, it gained the impression that it also increased the times it was"rewarded" with a pellet, although the release in fact remained entirely random.
No comments:
Post a Comment